JGI Founder Interface

Tool 1. Mobile Decision Packet Generator (Section 85)

The paper's format is NEED YOU, DECISION, RECOMMENDED, WHY, UPSIDE, RISK, REPLY: YES / NO / A / B. The paper gives no word limit, so this tool applies an illustrative limit of 40 words across WHY, UPSIDE, and RISK combined: a packet that fits on a phone screen. Anything over the limit is listed as cut.

Decision Options, one per line A. Keep Scan at $100 B. Raise Scan to $150 C. Drop Scan to $75 Recommended Why The $100 price is the live asking price and the free 10-minute qualifier already converts; changing it adds friction with no evidence. Upside Steady conversion from the qualifier, no rework. Risk Price may be under market, but no comp supports a raise. Build packet Reset

Illustrative limit: WHY, UPSIDE, and RISK combined must be 40 words or fewer. The paper itself sets no numeric limit.

Tool 2. Attention Firewall Budget (Sections 83 and 84)

The paper lists six conditions under which Jeramie is interrupted: authority required, business preference genuinely required, credentials/2FA needed, destructive recovery required, critical contradiction cannot be resolved, large strategic fork requires founder judgment. Otherwise: solve it. The paper gives no numeric budget, so this tool uses an illustrative budget you set yourself, with an illustrative cost of 15 minutes per interruption.

Interruption budget for today (count) Illustrative cost per interruption (minutes) Add an interruption Add interruption Reset log

Valid triggers are the six conditions in Section 84. Anything else is a bounce: per Section 83 it should have been solved without the founder. The 15-minute cost and the daily budget are illustrative; the paper gives neither.

Tool 3. Morning Intelligence Digest Builder (Section 88)

The morning report must answer eight questions: What changed? What did we accomplish? What real value resulted? What failed? What did we learn? What is running now? What requires me? What is next? Add overnight events, each tagged to one question, and the tool builds the digest with "What requires me?" first.

Overnight event Answers which question What changed? What did we accomplish? What real value resulted? What failed? What did we learn? What is running now? What requires me? What is next? Add event Load illustrative sample Clear

The sample is illustrative data, not a real overnight run.

Tool 4. Decision Journal (Section 176)

Important decisions record: options, evidence, forecast, choice, why, outcome. Later evaluate decision quality independently of outcome luck. Rate decision quality (how good the reasoning was) separately from outcome (how it turned out). The tool flags the luck-versus-skill cases: good decision with a bad outcome is bad luck, and a bad decision with a good outcome is good luck.

Decision Options Evidence Forecast Choice Why Log decision Load illustrative sample Clear journal

Quality and outcome are separate 1 to 5 ratings, per Section 176: evaluate decision quality independently of outcome luck. The sample entries are illustrative.

Tool 5. Brain-Dump Parser (Sections 187, 188, and 11)

Unstructured founder input is parsed into the eight categories of Section 187: ideas, goals, constraints, decisions, tasks, questions, commitments, hypotheses. Tasks are then scored with the Section 11 Task Utility function exactly as implemented in the JGI site: Utility is the sum of the eleven positive terms minus the sum of the eight negative terms, weights 1, each term 0 to 10. Verdict: SELECT at 20 or above, MARGINAL at 0 to 19, REJECT below 0.

Parsing rules, applied in this order: a line ending in "?" is a question; a line starting with "I will" or containing "commit" is a commitment; a line containing "hypothesis", "I believe", or "if" with "then" is a hypothesis; a line starting with "decide" or "choose", or containing "decision", is a decision; a line containing "must", "never", "cannot", or "should not" is a constraint; a line starting with "maybe", "what if", or "idea:" is an idea; a line starting with a task verb (do, build, call, ship, fix, write, send, research, check, update, review, file, schedule) is a task; anything else is a goal.

Task scoring heuristics, illustrative: R is 8 when the line mentions money, revenue, sale, price, buy, sell, or deal, otherwise 5. T is 9 for urgent, asap, tonight, or today, 7 for "this week", otherwise 5. H is 8 when the line mentions asking, deciding, or approving, otherwise 3. All other terms use fixed defaults: S, U, I, O, L, X, C, A, V are 5; K, D, P, Q, F, N, E are 3. The paper gives no per-task scoring formula, so these defaults are an illustrative implementation.

Paste a raw brain dump, one thought per line Parse and rank Load illustrative sample Clear